Hey I didn't say we don't want closures. I'm just saying, for Java's sake, "Closures, close thy self". :)
Maybe after bollocksing up generics, they are being super cautious. On Jan 28, 12:33 am, Hairless_ape <[email protected]> wrote: > We need to add something to Java. Closures is something, therefore we > must add closures to Java. > > Stop this destructive line of thought against closures or you will get > 5 days in the Dick Wall room. > (Oh and references to the Dick Wall room will NEVER get old) > > On Jan 27, 10:47 am, Christian Catchpole <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > How much resource (inside and outside of Sun) has been expended going > > over and over the multiple options for closures? I fear there is no > > balance to the force. * > > > * And here I was thinking I would never make a geeky star wars > > reference. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
