Sorry man, seems that you've basically misinformed.
Define a top-level function:
object f extends ((Int) => Int) { def apply(x:Int) = x + 1 }
Currying:
def f(x:Int)(y:Int) = x + y
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Robert Fischer <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If Dick is going to keep going on about how functional and mathematical
> Scala is, and how that's so
> great, maybe he should check out OCaml/F#?
>
> I've just posted to my blog about how Scala is *not* a functional language.
> Which is not to say
> it's a bad language -- it's just not a functional language.
>
> http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/posts/scala-not-functional/
>
> ~~ Robert Fischer.
> Grails Training http://GroovyMag.com/training
> Smokejumper Consulting http://SmokejumperIT.com
> Enfranchised Mind Blog http://EnfranchisedMind.com/blog
>
> Check out my book, "Grails Persistence with GORM and GSQL"!
> http://www.smokejumperit.com/redirect.html
>
> >
>
--
Viktor Klang
Rockstar Developer
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
