They probably have a problem with it behaving like -1. Now that they are using 2 bytes to keep track of their episode numbers, they shouldn't run into this problem for quite some time.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Keith Haber <[email protected]> wrote: > > A long time ago they reused an episode number as "part A" and "part > B". I'm too lazy to dig through the site archives to find the exact > episode number. Maybe they're just finally correcting for that? > > On Jun 9, 6:29 am, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > > I wondered the same, thought perhaps Dick had a surprise up his > > sleeve. > > > > /Casper > > > > On 9 Jun., 07:01, Jesper de Jong <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > You seem to have skipped episode number 255 - the JavaOne live podcast > > > was number #0x100, while the one before was episode 254. > > > > > What happened to episode 255? > > > -- Robert Casto www.robertcasto.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
