Just as a side-note, I'm not drunk, my wireless keyboard is just low on
battery...

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Viktor Klang <[email protected]>wrote:

> I recently view the Google Tech Talks on Clean Code, and I hae to say htat
> I'm becoming more and more adverse to dereferencing things that are not
> either passed into the constructor of the object at hand, or into the mthod
> being invoked. (I.e. No calls to singletons)
>
> When combined with Scala's excellent implicit parameters and currying, it
> becomes _very_ easy to deal with without losing testability.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:43 PM, E Winter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I suppose it is too much of a religious war but I would love more
>> discussion of code style.  You will have to gauge other fans but I
>> like to hear it hashed out.  Pick a coding practice of the week (good
>> or bad) and riff on it for 5 minutes.  I now am an anti-tab
>> evangelist!  Coding standards are a very key thing in development
>> after reading Clean Code I am even keener on it.
>>
>> On Jun 19, 5:51 am, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > The thing is, NetBeans (and even Java itself) is no longer just used
>> > for imperative programming where you can simply agree to conform to a
>> > 120 character line. Just staying with JEE technologies, we require
>> > editing files full of Facelet/XML, JavaScript, SQL/JPQL annotation
>> > etc. It's particular painful not having soft wrapping when dealing
>> > with embedded DSL's like SQL/JPQL, since Java does not support
>> > multiline strings making it next to impossible to copy-paste code
>> > between tools - unless you are OK with one humongous line (one String
>> > token).
>> >
>> > Soft wrapping has been pushed a few times thus far, I think I remember
>> > Jaroslav Tulac mention how hard it actually would be to do given the
>> > existing functionality of the editor. Still lets hope we'll get it
>> > eventually. :)
>> >
>> > /Casper
>> >
>> > On 19 Jun., 02:49, Augusto <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I like this comment from the bug report;
>> >
>> > > "This feature is necessary, for simple usability because is impossible
>> > > read a line code with thousands columns."
>> >
>> > > A line of code should never have "thousands of columns".
>> >
>> > > On Jun 18, 7:49 pm, TorNorbye <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > On Jun 18, 4:26 pm, TorNorbye <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > On Jun 18, 11:18 am, Erlend Hamnaberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > > Don't get me started on the deficiency of Netbeans. This feature
>> is a must
>> > > > > > and has been in all others IDEs forever.
>> >
>> > > > > Maybe it's been in "all other IDEs forever", but I just fired up
>> > > > > Eclipse 3.4 and I can't find it.   I'm sure it's there but I'm too
>> > > > > stupid to find it.  Where is it?
>> >
>> > > > (By the way I found Search > Java but I don't think that's the same
>> > > > feature; I'm looking for something similar to Eclipse's Open Type
>> > > > dialog where you can instantly see filtered results as you're
>> typing,
>> > > > where you don't have to tell it whether you're looking for a method
>> or
>> > > > field, where you jump to the declaration (the default in that dialog
>> > > > only shows references, etc.)
>> >
>> > > > -- Tor
>> >
>> > > > > > Why the hell isn't JAVA a language that needs attention in
>> Netbeans?
>> > > > > > Since this is written in Java, why isn't this the main language
>> supported
>> > > > > > Java is the LEAST developed language of them all.
>> > > > > > You reallly need to focus on your main language, which should be
>> Java.
>> >
>> > > > > > I really like Netbeans. But until you get REAL editor support
>> for JAVA, I
>> > > > > > can't use it.
>> >
>> > > > > Please define "real".
>> >
>> > > > > -- Tor
>> >>
>>
>
>
> --
> Viktor Klang
> Scala Loudmouth
>



-- 
Viktor Klang
Scala Loudmouth

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to