Can't we just make the interviews a little more like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bs1lKPdNfQ8 ?

2009/6/29 Michael Neale <[email protected]>

>
> I agree with your sentiments - its an important debate, but I guess a
> podcast is not the place for it.
>
> So perhaps should be left to the thunderdome: "2 technologies enter,
> only 1 leaves" type scenario ;)
>
> I also note Dick sounded very stressed in the episode, was an unusual
> one...
>
> On Jun 29, 11:03 am, Alan Kent <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Dear Posse,
> >
> > I love and continue to love the show and really appreciate all the hard
> > work you guys put in, completely voluntarily.  Its my #1 podcast.  To
> > Dick (Groovy) Wall, if you feel that ignoring JigSaw and OSGI keep you
> > more motivated and enjoying doing the podcast, then go for it.  Add them
> > to your spam filters!  The fact that the posse enjoy what you do I think
> > is one of the things that makes the show so enjoyable to listen to.  Its
> > great!  I love it!  Keep it coming!
> >
> > I found both the OSGI and JigSaw interviews interesting - thanks for
> > doing them.  But I also found it interesting that from the interviews
> > neither came out as being a clearly superior replacement of the other.
> > I suspect this means that longer, deeper articles are required to delve
> > into the topic - not something you would get on a podcast due to its
> > format.  It has always seemed to me their primary value propositions are
> > different: OSGI value is it allows code to be dynamically loaded at run
> > time, and JigSaw is tackling breaking up the JVM and includes compile
> > time changes to support modules too.
> >
> > But frankly, as a long time podcast listener, I don't care that some
> > feel JigSaw should not exist and OSGI should rule the world.  Both *are*
> > going to exist no matter what is said on this list.  So to me further
> > discussion along those lines is boring and a complete waste of time.  I
> > am more interested to learn more over time how the technical merits of
> > one or the other solve real problems.  So Dick, I would personally
> > consider it a great *favor* if you ignored that sort of content on the
> > podcast.
> >
> > Oh, I have added another email address to my spam filter as not
> > contributing any technical value to some of the great conversations on
> > this list.
> >
> > Alan
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to