On 7 Jul., 22:03, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote:
> What I would like to see:
>
> private @Getter int x = 5;
>
> I don't really need the C# feature where you can write the getter on
> location; most getters just return the value, and as long as the API
> works via a getFoo() call (and not via accessing a public field!) I
> can always change it later.
I said I was dreaming, bubble-burster! :P
Incidentally: I noticed I made IllegalAccessException-mistake in my
previous post. If anyone cares about my dreams:
private final Binding binding
= BindingLib.createBinding(
this#width#set, // the #set was missing
parent.width - 20
);
> Incidentally, I may have an announcement to make soon for those who
> like this idea :P (though IDEA and Netbeans people are going to be a
> bit disappointed...)
By now I barely have to guess what it's gonna be. Some sort of
bijektive transformation over parse trees to get eclipse users quasi-
properties and quasi-CICE without actual (Java) language support.
Being an eclipse user (don't fillet me, I'm just too lazy to switch) I
will have a hard time to overstate my satisfaction, but you have yet
to prove that the cake is in fact not a lie.
With kind regards
Ben
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
