I have. Nice APIs, but can generate some heinous SQL. Probably better now, haven't done anything serious with it in 3 years.
On Jul 24, 2:11 pm, orrego <[email protected]> wrote: > has anybody try using active record on rails? i have > slow, and buggy. > > On Jul 24, 3:30 am, Viktor Klang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Alex Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > By proven do you mean old, slow, buggy and with a dependency tree that > > > makes writing any project in the 21st Century a pain in the ass > > > because of conflicting versions of stuff? We stopped using Hibernate > > > a few weeks back, and our application experienced a serious > > > performance boost, not to mention that we get error messages now that > > > have information in them. > > > What did you switch to? > > > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:11 PM, orrego<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > i must 100% agree, GORM has all the dynamic behavior, plus better > > > > performance, and uses proven hibernate framework. > > > > > On Jul 23, 4:42 pm, Mac <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> In the listener feedback episode, Someone (Carl or Tor?) that said > > > >> that Java platform doesn't > > > >> have anything as nice as active record. > > > > >> GORM seems pretty good to me. :) It does all the dynamic behavior that > > > >> was > > > >> being listed in the episode. And as of Grails 1.1, you can use GORM > > > >> standalone > > > >> outside of Grails. > > > > >>http://www.grails.org/GORM > > > -- > > Viktor Klang > > > Rogue Scala-head > > > Twttr: viktorklang --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
