I completely agree with Bill. It is the easiest way to get what you want and not have to worry about any extras that could potentially cause problems.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Bill Robertson <[email protected]>wrote: > > With NB, its best to download the smallest package and add to it > through the plugin manager (tools->plugins). However, I think > downloading the JavaFX version of netbeans is probably equivalent to > starting with the base and then adding JavaFX. > > Jan, I don't know if is widespread agreement on good formatting for > JavaFX source code. The first (?) version of the plugin would format > code, but I didn't like the choices they made. It would also do it w/ > o asking, which was doubly bad. Don't know if they disabled it for > the bugs or for style. > > > > On Jul 28, 12:39 pm, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > > So if I want JavaFX I need the 90M one, but then I can't use it for > > regular Java? And if I get the 300M one I can do Java but not JavaFX? > > > > I'm not very familiar with Netbeans, which one should I get for JavaFX > > and Java but I don't need Ruby or C? > > > > On Jul 27, 1:29 pm, Jan Goyvaerts <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >http://www.netbeans.org/downloads/ > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
