Casper Bang wrote: > I came to the same conclusion some years ago, though you are likely to > find a lot who disagrees with the term "better" and who will raise the > kitchen sink argument. But any new unbiased developer touching both > are likely to come to that conclusion - Indeed that's why Mono was > created, at the time Java did not have the Enum type (and wasn't open > source). Mr. Clapper's list is far from complete btw, off the top of > my head I'd add: > > - Namespaces (separation between logical and physical organization) > Funny to see how features for one are a bug for another :-) > - Real generics (not emulated) > > More features does not make a better language of course, but it's > pretty clear that C# is no longer a clone of Java and is pushing some > interesting boundaries, which is likely to continue. > Maybe it's a clone of Scala? :-D
-- Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/blog [email protected] - mobile: +39 348.150.6941 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
