This happens all the time, large corporations taking preemptive
measures to protect IP. I bet Microsoft has a lot in their arsenal
they could use, haven't we really only seen them use the FAT patent
used (against TomTom) which was rather trivial to work around anyway?

In any event, it would seem Snoracle has the cash and motivation to
question Microsoft in court though no? Ellison isn't exactly known to
be a fan of Bill Gates, he might just find it more entertaining to win
over Microsoft than getting another new yacht.

/Casper

On 7 Aug., 17:36, Ryan Waterer <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'll link to the Slashdot discussion that happened yesterday.   There are a
> lot of excellent point and I won't attempt at bringing up them 
> all.http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/08/06/2322209/Microsoft-Patents-XML-...
>
> Bottom line is that there is quite a few examples of prior art in this
> case.  Once again, the USPTO failed to understand technology and awarded a
> useless patent.  Unfortunately, it will cost other companies a lot in legal
> defense in order to prove that there is/was prior art.
>
> --Ryan
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Jess Holle <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Mark Fortner wrote:
> > > I'm not a lawyer but I would imagine that ODF predates Microsofts
> > > attempts at XML-ifying Office and would therefore be considered prior
> > > art. The only way the patent would stand up in court would be if the
> > > scope only covered Microsoft Office (as opposed to anything
> > > Office-like) or if the judge was technologically clueless.
>
> > How many USPTO officials and judges are not clueless when it comes to
> > software technology?
>
> > It wouldn't seem that there could be a whole lot of them given the
> > current state of affairs.
>
> > --
> > Jess Holle
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to