Is it only me who thinks something is wrong with all these complaints about thread hi-jacking? I am quite used to discussions on mailing lists going astray and people just solving the problem by renaming the branches of the discussion. Sometimes I even answer to the same post twice to make the branch more explicit: one message for each.
Somehow this group seems to have a different culture and while I adapted I must say I find it sad. If your email client renames whole threads retrospectively, then your email client is broken, not the conversation style. It took me a while to realize that was happening last time I got bashed for hijacking a thread. But that's only my 2c. As long as the majority on this list thinks a thread should always stick to a single topic I'll try to play along. Peter Erlend Hamnaberg wrote: > Please hijack another thread. This started as a way of determining if > targeting jdk 5 is still a good idea. > > If anyone is interested, the project in question is found here: > > http://httpcache4j.codehaus.org/ > > the way i've done it now, is that I have created one module that > requires jdk6, everything else is targeted on jdk5. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
