Thanks, Reinier, I submitted an issue. As far as field prefixes, it's in our style guide and I've been doing it forever, but I'm starting to question it. As Roel mentioned, IDEs help you distinguish them. Our Groovy classes certainly don't have prefixes. It's cleaner... Hmm...
So how many folks use field prefixes still? Steve On Aug 25, 12:02 pm, Roel Spilker <[email protected]> wrote: > For fields of type boolean, Lombok will generate isFoo() unless a > method called getFoo() or hasFoo() exists :-) > > On Aug 25, 5:58 pm, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Ah, the wonderful inconsistent world of Java pseudo "properties". So > > for boolean types, will we generate isFoo() or getFoo() or both? > > > /Casper > > > On 25 Aug., 13:34, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I hope they soon add knowledge of Eclipse's field prefixes so the > > > @Data class annotation will generate getters/setters without the > > > prefix. > > > > Right now > > > > class @Data Car > > > private int fSpeed; > > > > produces > > > > setFSpeed(int) > > > getFSpeed() > > > > On Aug 24, 4:10 pm, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I don't have much to go on either, it just does nothing. I get the > > > > import statement and add the annotation, then nothing. I haven't tried > > > > it on a fresh Eclipse though. I'll try it on my home machine when I > > > > get there. > > > > > On Aug 24, 1:40 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hey Matt, > > > > > > I really don't know what to say. There's not much to go on when all I > > > > > get is "it doesn't work for us". Are there errors in the error view? > > > > > Did you try downloading a fresh new eclipse? Give me _something_ to > > > > > work with. > > > > > > On Aug 24, 7:28 pm, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Yeah, we installed it to our Eclipses. That's what's weird, it seems > > > > > > like it works fine for everybody but both of us. > > > > > > > On Aug 24, 11:07 am, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Sure, works fine here on 64bit Ubuntu 9.04 and Eclipse 3.5. Did > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > remember to install the extension to Eclipse (run lombok.jar as a > > > > > > > Java > > > > > > > application and point to your eclipse installation folder)? The > > > > > > > checkedException prototype does not work for me however. > > > > > > > > /Casper > > > > > > > > On 24 Aug., 18:46, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > My coworker and I tried it a few weeks ago and got nothing. We > > > > > > > > both > > > > > > > > got it to install but when we added the annotations and the > > > > > > > > import > > > > > > > > statements, nothing happened. Eclipse obviously saw the jar > > > > > > > > file since > > > > > > > > it would auto-add the import like it should have, but then > > > > > > > > nothing > > > > > > > > happened. I posted in their forum but I only got basically "It > > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > have worked" in response. We'd love to use it but since it did > > > > > > > > nothing > > > > > > > > for either of us we were a little disheartened. If it was just > > > > > > > > me that > > > > > > > > would be one thing but neither of us got anything. > > > > > > > > > Are we alone in having it not work for us? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
