On 22 Sep, 12:54, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Firstly, I think we still do not understand exactly what Joe means by
> > a component module. Even now, 6 months after Crested Butte.
>
> What's not to grok? Embrace divide and conquer and realize that a
> class is too fine grained. How we need higher abstractions where it's
> easy to make a "kit" that fits together out of any particular context.
>
I hazard to estimate that this subject touches very closely the Aspect
Oriented Architectures world,
modularity world and the runtime JVM world.
A Components API that works across all JVM languages is probably the
stuff of dreams right now. I think I did mention, or attempt to
mention something about this in the session over there
> > Flex sounds very much like, KDE originally architectures, what was it?
> > SLOT and Connections or something. It was like a message bus inside a
> > Graphics User Interface toolkit.
>
> Signals and Slots, the essence of Qt. Toolkit also available for Java
> through
> Jambi:http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-08-2007/jw-08-qtjambi.html?page=2
>
> > I think what we need in the language is group binding. See above and I
> > claim not to be a language designer.
>
> Known as multi-casting, no?
>
> /Casper
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
