I use it, and yes it's pretty good. I also find it useful for creating matchers in general, e.g., for matching mock arguments.
(One pet peeve is inconsistent placement of the Iterable in the params, e.g., filter(Matcher,Iterable) vs. sum(Iterable,Object). It would be easier if the Iterable was always first, but this isn't a big deal.) On Oct 21, 10:28 am, Balz <[email protected]> wrote: > You can check out this nice post about > lambdaj:http://ctpjava.blogspot.com/2009/10/lambdaj-new-trends-in-java.html > > I would say yes the javaposse meant this one... > > On Sep 17, 2:49 pm, Perttu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I just stumbled intolambdaj, which looks like it could help to reduce > > some of the verbosity of Java we've grown tired of. Has anyone tried > > it? Is this one of those projects which the Posse guys have been > > discussing lately which bring superficial closure-like features and > > were a bit controversial (I don' t remember the names of the projects > > right now) ? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
