> I liked it, the team I inflicted it on hated it, they liked doing it > all manually. I never understood that :)
In much the same way that unit test works best (see recent thread) when it concentrates on validating output, not the way the output was achieved. Human tracking also works best when measuring results, not the way those results were achieved. In this vein, the most successful software companies (e.g. Apple, Google, Microsoft, etc.) have had many articles written - over the years - about the games their developers play during office hours, their toys and gadgets, and their private projects and the like. Somehow they seem to have managed perfectly well without timekeepers and stop-watches measuring their every move. Vince. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
