It's not that hard to find. Just read Mark Reinhold's blog. That is indeed the plan; no JDK7 final release until there's a java7 JSR with the votes to carry it. You may fill in the blanks and presume that such a JSR would take the form of an umbrella JSR, as all javaX JSRs have been so in the past, and that this umbrella includes everything currently slated for JDK7, provided that we're all intelligent people and otherwise every blog post would have to become a 50 page document that nobody is actually going to read. This isn't a health care bill. You may also freely presume that if the Java7 umbrella gets stuck politically due to e.g. the continuing Field of Use clause war between apache and sun (see colebourne's blog entries over the past year for more info on that), that sun will simply release JDK7 without a java7 JSR. This is an intention, not a solemn pledge.
On Dec 11, 8:58 pm, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > So will Project Lambda and Project Coin eventually map to each their > own JSR's, forming JDK7 along with JSR-292 (InvokeDynamic), JSR-294 > (Jigsaw), JSR-308 (type annotations), JSR-166xyz (Doug Lea's > concurrency stuff) and NIO2 (new new I/O)? Is this the current state > of JDK7? It's getting a little hard to track I find. > > /Casper > > On Dec 11, 8:38 pm, Serge Boulay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > for those interested, Mark posted the Straw-Man proposal > > >http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/lambda/straw-man/ > > > his blog > > >http://blogs.sun.com/mr/entry/closures_straw_man -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
