That other guy is Michael Neale. He's clearly a pervert. On the subject of SOA, which got flamed a few posts up, I think you need to separate the concept of thinking of an Enterprise architecture as a collection of Services, which has real value, from the WS-* train wreck.
Yes, SOA is over egged, No, its not the solution the worlds ills, but its a useful architectural approach, and its a level of abstraction, I believe, above 'well modularised code'. That all said, I'll admit its also pretty difficult to execute with all the noise going on in a typical Enterprise. On Dec 12, 4:56 pm, Brian Leathem <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/12/09 5:10 PM, Ben Schulz wrote: > > > I'll quote Reinier from the UML-plugin-thread: > > >> Jesus, Tim. I just finished yelling at some other paranoid nutcase for > >> blaming this on sun/oracle. Sit down, and listen. > > > So, if you're still concerned, well, I really can't help you. > > > With kind regards > > Ben > > I think what Ben is saying is that if you look through Reinier's many > posts in this forum, you'll find plenty of instances where he is giving > an unreasonably excessive amount of criticism. I wouldn't take it to > heart - in fact it adds to the character of this forum in it's own way. > Kind of like the other guy who keeps threatening to expose compromising > photos of various posters. It's all becoming part of the community. I > only wish I could make it out to one of the round-ups to see it all > first hand :P > > Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
