I have my own reservations about these container RIA's. But what I don't understand, is how DHTML/JavaScript is more testable than static languages like JavaFX/C#.
/Casper On Jan 12, 7:25 pm, Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com> wrote: > Entirely dismissing Flex, JavaFX, and Silverlight all because they don't > have as many automated testing tools as DHTML seems a bit much. > > Testability is a great *ability. It is not the only *ability, though. > > Testing DHTML isn't a panacea either. Once you get unpredictable > database ids and other real-world stuff involved one can't achieve the > panacea promised by various testing frameworks. > > > > Casper Bang wrote: > > Can't say I was surpriced to read this analysis from ThoughWorks > > (Martin Fowler): > >http://www1.vtrenz.net/imarkownerfiles/ownerassets/1013/Technology%20... > > > Were you?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
