I think I'd consider using www.liftweb.com or plain Scala On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Mark Fortner <[email protected]> wrote:
> It sounds like you're trying to avoid the logical solution: namely XSLT. > The w2schools.com has a good tutorial and reference for XSLT ( > http://www.w3schools.com/xsl) and XPath http://www.w3schools.com/xpathshould > help with the learning curve. JEdit has some XSLT, XPath and XQuery > plugins that make the process of developing XSLTs fairly painless. > > If you need to test the XSLTs, I might suggest taking a look at using > approval tests. You can verify that individual transforms are working > properly by comparing the anticipated and actual results. There's an > approval test plugin for Eclipse. http://www.approvaltests.sf.net. > > You might also try making each transform as atomic as possible. This will > make it easier to test. You can combine them together later using > xsl:include. > > If you want to see some well structured, easy-to-test XSLT code, you might > take a look at the xmlresume project on sourceforge. > > Hope this helps, > > Mark > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Mark Volkmann <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> I prefer XQuery over XSLT, but don't find XSLT to be too difficult. I >> recommend using Saxon. It supports XQuery 1, XSLT 2 and XPath 2. >> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Rakesh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > we have a requirement on our project to take some xml and transform it >> into >> > html for rendering. >> > >> > Obviously this screams xslt but I remember using it and it wasn't that >> fun >> > (steep learning curve, hard to test, etc). >> > >> > A more Java-centric solution would be better and SAX-type solution is >> > obviously something to consider. However, I haven't looked in this area >> for >> > more than 5 years. >> > >> > Its 2010, is there anything new out there? >> > >> > Cheers >> > >> > Rakesh >> > >> > PS it needs to be perfromant. >> >> -- >> R. Mark Volkmann >> Object Computing, Inc. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "The Java Posse" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >> >> >> > > > -- > Mark Fortner > > blog: http://feeds.feedburner.com/jroller/ideafactory > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- Viktor Klang | "A complex system that works is invariably | found to have evolved from a simple system | that worked." - John Gall Blog: klangism.blogspot.com Twttr: twitter.com/viktorklang Code: github.com/viktorklang--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
