Good point. Yet another issue where the iPad should be a master USB
device. One would imagine that the iPad is going to get an dock <->
master USB/A cable along with the needed software to make it work.

On Feb 1, 6:46 pm, Brian <[email protected]> wrote:
> Something that occurred to me about the iPad. It's cool that they've
> made Pages and Numbers (and Keynote) for it, but... how do you print
> documents from the iPad? I'm guessing that you can't. It would be very
> convenient to be able to use printers available wirelessly, but I
> suspect they haven't bothered with that (at least not yet). Therefore,
> I assume that you need:
>
> 1. a Mac (not a PC, see #2) to sync the iPad with
> 2. iWork for Mac
> 3. a printer (duh... though without one, you could at least still make
> a PDF to share)
>
> I think this limits its potential use as a laptop replacement for
> students. It also makes the $9.99 price per app a little less
> surprisingly generous; you still have to have iWork for Mac to do
> anything useful with the documents outside of the iPad.
>
> Again, this is pure speculation. Does anyone know/suspect anything
> different?
>
> On Jan 31, 9:07 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The thing I _really_ want to know about the iPad is simply this:
>
> > Can you sync an iPhone to it? Can you sync a camera to it?
>
> > That first bit can most likely be taken care of via mobile.me (but
> > what about music?). The second bit - that's more confusing. Wiring two
> > slave-mode USB devices together is not simple, though I'm fairly sure
> > the dock connector has enough free pins for 2 of them to form a master
> > USB side. Given that the iPad is closed, a third party can't make such
> > a cable. Well, they can, but without software it won't do anything,
> > and you can't write the software without escaping the sandbox, which
> > the appstore won't let you do.
>
> > Syncing to another phone isn't relevant; RIM/BlackBerry isn't relevant
> > for iPad customers, WinMobile devices aren't used as smartphones, and
> > android and palm sync via the cloud.
>
> > If it can do these things, then I see absolutely no reason to let me
> > parents carry on with their current macbook. I'll give em both an iPad
> > and they'll be far happier, and so will I. My dad has already
> > installed far more apps on his iPhone than he ever managed on his
> > macbook.
>
> > That's where I see the iPad going: As the _ONLY_ computer device for a
> > very very large group of people. I really don't see the 'extra PC for
> > the extremely lazy farts who can't get off their couch to go grab
> > their notebook'. I don't have the numbers offhand, but I expect that
> > the market of folks who are even going to consider buying one are far
> > more likely to own a notebook than a desktop PC anyway.
>
> > I'd also be a little less ready to scream blood and murder about the
> > closed nature of the device if at the very least this insanity is
> > fixed: To become a developer, you don't _just_ have to cough up $99
> > bucks, you also have to sign an NDA. Which legally can't really be
> > done unless you're 18+. I don't know about the rest of you folks, but
> > I started on the path to learning programming when I was less than
> > half that age.
>
> > I really don't have the time, but I'd love to make some sort of
> > advanced logo-esque programming language for the iPad, abstracting
> > subroutines and the like as blocks you can drag about with gestures,
> > and syncing your programs to the cloud including a social aspect where
> > you can see your friends' programs and the like. Technically even such
> > a simple thing would run afoul of the TOS, but, god, that would be an
> > awesome learning environment for young programmers, wouldn't it?
>
> > On Jan 31, 1:40 pm, Karsten Silz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > First of all, I'm glad now that Oracle bought Sun since that probably
> > > did save more jobs and kept more projects alive than being bought by
> > > IBM.  I was skeptic at first but not anymore.
>
> > > Now onto some comments to both Oracle and the iPad.
>
> > > Killed projects: Beyond Kenai, it seems that the Amazon-EC2-clone by
> > > Sun (Sun Cloud?), announced at JavaOne last year, is dead 
> > > (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/28/sun_amazon_cloud_dead/).
>
> > > Glassfish: To put some necessary distance between the free Glassfish
> > > and the "$10,000 per CPU" Weblogic, Glassfish "will be geared for
> > > departmental use" (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/
> > > 2010/01/27/urnidgns852573C400693880002576B900002824.DTL), like Apache
> > > Geronima and Websphere at IBM.  So I expect high-end, enterprise
> > > features to either wither away from Glassfish or not being added at
> > > all, making Glassfish less attractive for some developers.
>
> > > Netbeans: I know that the slides said that Netbeans will focus on
> > > dynamic scripting languages, but in the webcast Ted Farrell said that
> > > Oracle wants to "invest into the community for dynamic languages", or
> > > so, which I interpreted as Oracle handing those over to the
> > > community.  Time will tell.
>
> > > iPad: I think the iPad is a new mass-market platform platform with the
> > > first new UI paradigm since "keyboard, mouse and GUI" became
> > > dominant.  With permanent internet connectivity, great media
> > > capability and a large touch screen, I'm excited to see what
> > > developers come up with.  I think that one of the reasons that past
> > > tablet efforts failed to gain wide traction where because both the OS
> > > and the apps were built upon "keyboard, mouse and GUI" and just
> > > slightly adapted; the iPad forces developers to start either from
> > > scratch or from their iPhone apps, which is good.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to