I don't think this is what the NIO2 stuff is based on. Carl would know for
sure.

I think this was originally what Sun's webnfs product was based on.

Mark

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:01 PM, eric4jet <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is somewhat dated material, but Sun's webnfs was open sourced and
> is available here:
> https://yanfs.dev.java.net/
> Perhaps this is what the 'NIO stuff in JDK7' that James mentioned is
> based on?
>
> Anyway, I downloaded the source for a project I was working on, but
> ended up going another direction.  It looked pretty cool.
>
> -Eric
>
>
> On Mar 6, 10:52 am, Sebastian Himberger
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Alfresco has CIFS and NFS servers:
> http://wiki.alfresco.com/wiki/File_Server_Subsystem#Introduction
> > It's Open Source BUT I think not for commercial use. I actually don't
> > think thats the way to go but if it is no issue with you, you can
> > download the source at:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/alfresco/files/JLAN/.
> > The whole alfresco model seems a bit strange to me.
> >
> > On Mar 6, 2:38 am, James Dumay <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Working on an internal project that required writing lots of files to a
> > > WebDav server I spent an entire week screwing around with Commons VFSs
> > > webdav implementation. I gave up and wrote a cute wrapper around
> Jackrabbits
> > > Webdav HTTP Client methods which worked much better :)
> >
> > > Looks like the new NIO stuff in JDK7 has a Virtual File System SPI that
> > > might be interesting to have a look at.
> >
> > > James
> >
> > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Christian Catchpole <
> [email protected]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > Hmm.. it appears to be a client perspective API. "It presents a
> > > > uniform view of the files from various different sources, such as the
> > > > files on local disk, on an HTTP server, or inside a Zip archive."
> > > > I'll look at it though, and see what it contains.
> >
> > > > There seems to be lots of NFS clients around, as this is the common
> > > > use case.
> >
> > > > On Mar 6, 9:40 am, Mark Fortner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > You might try Apache Commons VFS which supports a large number of
> file
> > > > > systems including WebDAV.  WebDAV volumes are mountable via the
> Windows
> > > > File
> > > > > Manager as well as from OS X File Manager and the Nautilus File
> Manager
> > > > in
> > > > > Linux.
> >
> > > > > Hope this helps,
> >
> > > > > Mark
> >
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Christian Catchpole <
> > > > [email protected]
> >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > I have been pondering adding a "virtual file system" to one of my
> > > > > > projects.  The idea is that I have data in a managed store which
> could
> > > > > > be represented as files. Also you could add files to the store by
> > > > > > dropping the files into the drive.  I'm trying to avoid the
> manual
> > > > > > syncing of a real file system.
> >
> > > > > > Creating the native bridge sounds painful and would be different
> on
> > > > > > each platform.  An FTP or SSH server could work but this is still
> > > > > > clunky.
> >
> > > > > > So this got me to thinking about network file systems.  I could
> create
> > > > > > a server connector in Java.  I can see there are a bunch of
> projects
> > > > > > around that do this.  Mostly university projects and they have
> various
> > > > > > licenses.  But there seem to be a range of different protocols,
> and
> > > > > > each have their own implications of features, which ports they
> use and
> > > > > > which OSes support them.  Plus, I assume it's a "one server per
> IP"
> > > > > > proposition (not like a web server where you can just change to
> port
> > > > > > 8080 if 80 is in use).
> >
> > > > > > Does anyone have experience in this space and can offer any
> > > > > > recommendations?
> >
> > > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_File_System_(protocol)<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_File_System_%28protocol%29>
> <
> > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_File_System_%28protocol%29>
> >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google
> > > > Groups
> > > > > > "The Java Posse" group.
> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> <javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
> > > > <javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> >
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > > "The Java Posse" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> <javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
> > > > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to