Learning to read would probably help me :) On Mar 8, 3:17 pm, Jess Holle <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/8/2010 12:24 PM, [email protected] wrote:> It very much is a > deployment/architecture issue. :) I shoulda > > mentioned that. Sorry. It's taken longer than anticipated to > > convince this client to move into a more enterprise ready architecture > > (cost in a down economy). So, I am left to fend off the issues of a > > production solution that is not ideal. > > > Thanx for the insight on the visualvm bugs. I had never looked into > > it enough to find them. > > They're actually JVM bugs, not VisualVM bugs.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
