This sounds especially bogus because cross-compilation could be both undetectable and therefor irrelevant. So if you get your team to cross compile by hand, will apple say "you can't write code while thinking about another language".
It's kind of like saying "don't write code without wearing pants". How far can contracts and agreements go? Are there laws (in any country) which state that agreements and contracts can't contain irrelevant or discriminatory terms? Not that it matters I guess. They could just omit that term and reject the apps anyway. Fabrizio used the word "illegal". Is it correct to use the term illegal for a breach of contract? Sure you can be sued. But when I think of Illegal i think of breaking laws. Actual laws, not "first born child, i can write what i want in a contract". And the no-sue terms are saying "the legal system applies to us, but not to you". ps. speaking of irrelevant, my cat is now on twitter. http://twitter.com/BilliKitty -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
