It does, and you WILL be running on a 64-bit JVM. But it eats no more memory than a 32-bit JVM would, and it can still access a full 16GB of memory vs. standard 32-bit ~3GB.
On Apr 29, 2:52 am, Marcelo Fukushima <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that option requires at least java6 update 14 > > On Apr 28, 2010 9:16 PM, "Reinier Zwitserloot" <[email protected]> wrote: > > In my admittedly limited experience, 64-bit JVMs eat way more memory > and are barely faster, often slower. Something that did help quite a > bit is the hybrid mode: Operations and pointers etc. are all 32-bit, > but the pointer references are compressed, which gives you more like > 16GB of maximum addressable memory. > > For more info see this useful blog post (not mine, and a bit > dated):http://blog.juma.me.uk/2008/10/14/32-bit-or-64-bit-jvm-how-about-a-hy... > > On Apr 29, 1:16 am, Alan Kent <[email protected]> wrote:> If there is any > JNI in the project yo... > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" grou... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
