Heck yes. This is fantastic. On May 15, 7:42 pm, RogerV <[email protected]> wrote: > I like this proposal and I think adding closures to Java will indeed > force out an issue of how to deal with revving the collection > interfaces. > > A way of "extending" existing interfaces would be preferable to the > duplication and enhancement approach - which just leads to a form of > information bloat/clutter as there becomes the old interface way and > the new interface way. > > Too, it would be a language feature that would help out those folks > that are sustaining publicly used libraries/frameworks (and we > certainly have tons of those in the Java community) who have pretty > much the same interface maintenance dilemma. > > Hope this gets serious consideration. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
