Well, what I meant was if you layout with XML you lose a lot of imperative code constructs (like loops). Sure you can code it all in actionscript instead, but then you lose the declarative natures. JavaFX does both.
On May 16, 11:44 am, Karsten Silz <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16 Mai, 18:57, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Problem with flex is it's XML, so > > pretty inflexible (just like Ant, great for simple - sucky for > > complex) > > False, I believe. I think the "UI XML" that you create visually in > the the Flex / Flash Builder gets compiled internally into > ActionScript by the Flex compiler and runs this way in the Flash > Player. I know that you can at least write re-usable Flex components > in ActionScript directly, and you may even do that for your Flex UI > mostly / completely (http://willperone.net/Code/as3ui.php). If any of > the Adobe guys read this group, maybe they can confirm. > > In a sense, iPhone development works the same way - you either create > your UI in Interface Builder visually, or you create in Objective-C in > your controller, or you mix both. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
