You're right! That's why I said it's not so bad... (still bad though)
To be honest I'd rather not use any web framework, but I found SpringMVC to be bearable... On 15 July 2010 14:58, Moandji Ezana <mwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM, twitter.com/nfma < > nuno.filipe.marq...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I said the same on the first version but this last one is a bit better... >> at least it doesn't have the ModelAndView objects... you can use it without >> JSP... > > > OK, it's no longer atrocious, it's just poor. Two specific things that > regularly annoy me about Spring MVC: > > - the data-binding of multi-valued parameters to Collections. It's > ridiculously > convoluted <http://mattfleming.com/node/134> for such a basic task. And > they seem to not really care, as they let it > break<http://jira.springframework.org/browse/SPR-6871>in 3.0.1. > - it is possible for a submitted form field to be bound to several objects, > which is ludicrous and sloppy > > Moandji > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
