It's also funny that OO today is not what Alan Kay meant<http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~ram/pub/pub_jf47ht81Ht/doc_kay_oop_en>when he coined the term...
On 15 July 2010 15:53, Kirk <[email protected]> wrote: > OO is just a better way to organize code then what was previously being > used. Objects are little gestalts or little containers that hide complexity. > I can think of something (like a list) and I know what it does and how to > use it without needing to understand how it works. The real world is like > that however OO is not the real world ;-) > > Kirk > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
