Something in this direction( I mean JSF ).. http://www.javabeat.net/tips/148-advantages-and-disadvantages-jsf.html
http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31577 To be honest, I found JSF's back-end archuitecture (for hiding logic) very useful and business friendly. I do not know much about Lift but it sure is cool at first look..I dont know how well my PM will like this, especially when I look at the options available to us(at the lowest cost).. We have the client hiding so much logic on the back-end with tweaks and tunings that make security a big issue.Not to forget reusability as this an maintenance project ( :(..ya I know) Anyways, thanks for the update. Stil I want to know why JSF is so hated.. Regards, jd On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Viktor Klang <viktor.kl...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:21 PM, jitesh dundas <jbdun...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1.. >> >> JSF is good for security purposes and t he reason that it is in demand >> (again :)..) is the back-end security with integration that makes life so >> easy.. >> > > Sorry, but JSF has nothing when compared to Lift when it comes to security. > > >> >> It is the ease of business logic and sense that matters, not the framework >> integration efforts down the drain.. >> >> Regards, >> JD >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Vince O'Sullivan >> <vjosulli...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> On Jul 15, 10:36 am, Carl Jokl <carl.j...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > I did get a book on JSF in the past but I expect it will be out of >>> > date now as JSF 2.0 has come out. I know JSF is criticised for being >>> > more complex than it is felt it needs to be. That said others >>> > challenge that it is not as complex as it is made out to be. >>> >>> I'm no expert on web frameworks by any means but I have been getting >>> into JSF 1.2 recently. Accidentally, I downloaded the JSF 2.0 sample >>> code for Geary and Horstmann's Core JavaServer Faces book and was >>> puzzled with the examples worked although half the code was >>> "missing". It turns out JSF 2.0 is much, much simpler than JSF 1.2. >>> The use of annotations means that the cursed faces-config.xml file is >>> much smaller, simpler and sometimes not needed at all. >>> >>> (Unfortunately, this discovery cost me another thirty quid for the >>> latest edition of the book. Can well recommend it, though.) >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "The Java Posse" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> >>> . >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >>> >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "The Java Posse" group. >> To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > Viktor Klang > | "A complex system that works is invariably > | found to have evolved from a simple system > | that worked." - John Gall > > Akka - the Actor Kernel: Akkasource.org > Twttr: twitter.com/viktorklang > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
