Sorry. I miscommunicated. They use a heap of a Java stack obviously in the technology. But I haven't heard Android using the term "Java" much at all from a trademarks point of view.
I thought the deal was you could fork OpenJDK but you just couldn't call it "Java". On Aug 15, 4:21 pm, Marcelo Fukushima <[email protected]> wrote: > Technically android uses java/jvm bytecode to generate dex > > On Aug 14, 2010 8:49 PM, "Christian Catchpole" <[email protected]> > wrote: > Well, they aren't arguing trademark issues. They are arguing > patents. Compare the situation to the patent holders of MPEG codecs. > They don't want or encourage anyone to implement of of their "patents" > without license fees. That's not what Sun did. > > Android only ever said "Java source code". > > On Aug 15, 9:43 am, jitesh dundas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > FUnny..But the point is.. > > > Googl... > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Could you argue that Open Sourcing technology that is protect... > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" grou... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
