Could the copyright be as simple as stating that they did not satisfy the copyright claims of the JDK so that they do not get to use the patented stuff for free?
On Aug 17, 6:24 am, Fabrizio Giudici <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 8/17/10 12:13 , Reinier Zwitserloot wrote: > > > Which is why, for the umpteenth time, Oracle is suing Google based > > on patents, and not copyright or trademarks. > > Indeed, in the compliant there is also a copyright thing (it's after > all the patents). It seems that nobody has figured it out what's > about. I think that the patents are the real meet, though. > > - -- > Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager > Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." > java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici -www.tidalwave.it/people > [email protected] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkxqY20ACgkQeDweFqgUGxdPbwCgqnMzfzUnTAoykCNHSFbJTb67 > 6VEAn1b7zhQ5HM9I1LlsM1F/vaVqSlYx > =9o0n > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
