On Aug 18, 4:02 pm, Fabrizio Giudici <[email protected]> wrote: > In the end, all the fears around are about the OpenJDK not being safe > enough from patents, because it's GPLv2 and allegedly it only provides > partial protection from patents.
I'm not sure I follow the argument here. Are you saying that if OpenJDK (or, by implication, any other software) is released under the appropriate licence then it becomes immune from patent claims? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
