Yeah, love Clojure It's definitely elegant, and it's hard to argue against homoiconicity as a desirable quality in any programming language.
OTOH, I'm even more convinced about the benefits of static typing... On 25 August 2010 13:37, B Smith-Mannschott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 08:55, Kevin Wright <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> http://michid.wordpress.com/2010/08/24/so-scala-is-too-complex/ >> >> <http://michid.wordpress.com/2010/08/24/so-scala-is-too-complex/>I'm >> curious, does anyone have an example of the same problem being solved in >> both Java and Scala, with Java offering the simplest solution? >> > > The Scala solution really is nice. I'd be learning Scala if I wasn't busy > learning Clojure. Someday, I'll speak both, but for now: > http://gist.github.com/549408 , though my solution is perhaps a little > code-golfy. > > // Ben > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- Kevin Wright mail/google talk: [email protected] wave: [email protected] skype: kev.lee.wright twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
