No, but I'll qualify it: Allowing simultaneous reification of both declaration-site and call-site variance would be hideously complicated. The two schemes already work together well enough when erasure is used :)
On 31 August 2010 21:39, Ben Schulz <[email protected]> wrote: > On 31 Aug., 21:04, Kevin Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > > Allowing both declaration-site and call-site > > variance would be hideously complicated! > > Do you want to retract that? :) > > With kind regards > Ben > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- Kevin Wright mail/google talk: [email protected] wave: [email protected] skype: kev.lee.wright twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
