I think this all demonstrates the risk of having a "not-so open" JDK. If Java was truly open, and had active committers from different companies, then a single event like the takeover of Sun, would not have resulted in months where nothing got done.
Mark 2010/9/8 Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> > > > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Ricky Clarkson > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> You need to read that a bit more closely. Mid-2012 is under a plan >> they are gravitating away from. >> > > From Mark's post: > > Plan A: JDK 7 (as currently defined) Mid 2012 > Plan B: JDK 7 (minus Lambda, Jigsaw, and part of Coin) Mid 2011 > JDK 8 (Lambda, Jigsaw, the rest of Coin, ++) Late 2012 > > > To me, "JDK 7 minus Lambda, Jigsaw and part of Coin" doesn't sound much > like "Getting Java moving again". > > -- > Cédric > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
