On 8 September 2010 22:07, Serge Boulay <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Plan A: JDK 7 (as currently defined) Mid 2012 >> > Plan B: JDK 7 (minus Lambda, Jigsaw, and part of Coin) Mid 2011 >> > JDK 8 (Lambda, Jigsaw, the rest of Coin, ++) Late 2012 >> > >> > To me, "JDK 7 minus Lambda, Jigsaw and part of Coin" doesn't sound much >> > like "Getting Java moving again". >> >> Getting the real lambda is probably worth the delay. > > why do you think we are getting the "real lambda's" with this delay? Did the > scope of the lambda project change with the delay? Well, given the only thing we can have now, i.e. limited lambdas (I admit not having checked lambda-dev for a past month or so but last time I did, function types - for example - were out of scope) on one hand and the *possibility* of full lambdas in the future, I choose the latter. M, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
