Whether the Google claims that Oracle is attacking Open Source is true or not, having the FSF backing them up is certainly going to give some credibility to the claim... Don't you think ?
On 9 September 2010 16:05, B Smith-Mannschott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 15:20, Ricky Clarkson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I wouldn't say you're being a dick, just incorrect: >> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html >> >> Ricky. >> >> > I stand corrected. I followed the link and discovered that the FSF > distinguishes two classes of free licenses, those that are GNU compatible > and those that aren't. > > // Ben > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- Romain PELISSE, *"The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it" -- Terry Pratchett* http://belaran.eu/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
