ScalaFX, GroovyFX... It could be done as a DSL
On 20 September 2010 21:03, Jan Goyvaerts™ <[email protected]> wrote: > Would there be in fact a problem to re-create the JavaFX language ? > Forbidden probably... > > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 21:33, clay <[email protected]> wrote: > >> wow! I would have lost that bet... >> >> On Sep 20, 2:13 pm, Jo Voordeckers <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Unfortunately it's true.... I was in the JavaFX 2.0 session. >> > >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "The Java Posse" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- Kevin Wright mail / gtalk / msn : [email protected] pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
