On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Kevin Wright <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > 2010/9/22 Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> > >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Kevin Wright >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Instead, a language can offer exhaustive pattern matches in a range of >>> other, non-exceptional scenarios, so offering the best of both worlds. >> >> >> In my opinion, the best of both worlds would be being able to handle >> exceptions in any stack frame with an easier syntax than Java's current one, >> possibly with pattern matching on the exception type. Unfortunately, no >> language supports both this and checked exceptions today. >> >> > Sure it does, if I widen my previous code a little: > I know you never miss an opportunity to post Scala code, but please, read my posts a little bit more carefully, I specifically mentioned checked exceptions, so I stand by my claim: no language supports these two features today. -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
