If Paul says every word correctly, it's just no fun for Reinier. On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Josh Suereth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> No, Paul isn't right. The parser does NOT reject: >> >> "foo bar baz bam" >> >> because it means "foo.bar(baz).bam()". It cannot determine that that >> particular meaning doesn't work, for example because "baz" doesn't >> exist, or "bar" does not take any arguments, until some later phase. >> > > What's the real difference if the phrase is rejected on compilation? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
