Not wishing to perpetuate any flames but I just wanted to shake my bacon for a second. I do find it ironic that developers complain of being tethered with old, underpowered, languages. Yet they criticise anything esoteric or not suitable for immediate use by a monkey. How often do you hear "we'd all be better off if we went back to Random Language X (which by the way, can't open a socket)." Criticism can be useful, but try to remember the context in which you apply it.
I have been trying to gather some thoughts on the idea that language simultaneously means everything and nothing (or should mean nothing) in software engineering. (its easy to explain why its everything, i'm still working on the nothing part) Christian END OF BACON SHAKE -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
