Whoops, sorry, I created a new thread for this, didn't realize Henning Hoefer already spotted this.
On Oct 2, 8:39 am, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah it sure is insanity. Add on top of that, all the "will not sue > one another" alliances. > > On Oct 2, 12:01 am, Fabrizio Giudici <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 10/1/10 23:35 , Henning Hoefer wrote:> And another one, today: > > > >http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/01/microsoft-files-itc-complaint-agai... > > > This is probably what HTC paid for to avoid (http://www.engadget.com/ > > > 2010/04/28/microsoft-says-android-infringes-on-its-patents-licenses- > > > htc/)... > > > That's surprising, indeed. So, generally speaking (I'm not referring to > > any player) paying for patents is just like paying protection money to > > the mafia: even if you pay, you're not guaranteed that they won't put a > > bomb anyway. > > > -- > > Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager > > Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." > > java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici -www.tidalwave.it/people > > [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
