Personally, I think that either you stick to Java and the JVM as it is (and
accept whatever the owner will do with it) or go with a radically different
VM-based language. (VM-based because otherwise we're back to the stone age
of platform-dependent languages.) In the latter case it's a leap of faith
that will take time to become concrete. As Java did 15 years ago.

Does Harmony fit the bill ?

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 21:45, Augusto Sellhorn
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Sounds like a really bad idea.
>
> Also, why this instead of supporting Harmony instead?
>
> On Oct 4, 3:01 pm, amiro <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Here's a link to an article by someone called Greg Luck.
> >
> > http://www.dzone.com/links/is_it_time_to_fork_java.html
> >
> > Greg proposes a Java fork which would maintain compatibility with
> > existing Java6 code.
> >
> > I am wondering if this is indeed a good time, and if it's even legally
> > possible to fork it without licensing issues.
> >
> > I am thinking of a few reasons for the fork: the disappointing
> > progress with Java 7 (several features pushed back to Java 8, maybe
> > java 9/10..), the general frustration with the JCP process, and the
> > worrying dominance of the Java platform by a single organisation.
> >
> > Do you think there is a valid case for a fork, is it even feasible,
> > and could it gain traction within the community?
> >
> > What would be the licensing obstacles?
> > How could such a project be managed effectively?
> > Is there anything which could be improved in terms of the JCP, and
> > adding new features more quickly?
> >
> > Here's an insteresting reaction post by someone called Sacha:
> >
> > http://sacha.labourey.com/2010/10/04/time-to-fork-java-si-vis-pacem-p...
> >
> > Personally, I like the idea of a few copyleft (GPL) forks starting up,
> > with the *hope* that the strongest fork could become embraced in a
> > nice fluffy, happy agreement. ;)
> >
> > Any thoughts?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to