Yeah, I don't think there isn't much that wont compile to Java.. But it might come down to how cryptic unmaintainable the result is if your boss insists you "stick to java".
On Oct 6, 3:25 pm, Ricky Clarkson <[email protected]> wrote: > Some languages with decent type systems can compile to C, so why not to Java? > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Christian Catchpole > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think it would be awesome if we had langauges which would cross- > > compile cleanly to and from Java. Of course, the langauge would have > > to closly align with Java's type system (not do too many special > > tricks) if you want it to coexist with vanilla Java. Of course some > > features just might not have a java equiv. > > > So lombok taken to another level. Reinier would probably be best to > > comment on some if the finer points of the whole idea. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "The Java Posse" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
