> You're making a logic insinuation here that anything C# does is good > enough for Java.
Well I could've picked from several other languages, i.e. Ruby [http:// ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Float.html] but it just so happens that C# is the closest younger sibling to Java. > Is it a good name? Not really, its not always evident what it does, > and in general a constant name should be clear without needing to read > documentation. Also, Integer.MIN_VALUE means something entirely > different, making it worse. In any event, the discussion started as an attempt to show how JavaScript inherited some "unfortunate genes" from Java. I feel that's been at least partly accomplished. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
