I just saw a presentation on this and no closures won't solve everything. 
Otherwise they wouldn't be changing a language that already has closures. For 
sure closures make callback programming less painful but you still have the 
inversion of control that makes complex flows hard to write.

- Neil

On 9 Nov 2010, at 14:27, Reinier Zwitserloot l<[email protected]> wrote:

> Java holds backwards compatibility as sacrosanct, and its current
> designers know this. Therefore, they don't add features unless its
> clearly the best possible answer given existing constraints. As you
> just said, you're not entirely happy with this. It therefore wouldn't
> fit well in java.
> 
> That link (to tomasp.net) is down so I can't review the change, but
> this sounds like an issue where closures solve everything. Closures
> are coming, why add a stopgap measure that cannot be removed?
> 
> On Nov 9, 1:11 am, RogerV <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Yet another language evolution area where Microsoft's C#/VB languages
>> for .NET are racing on ahead to provide a solution within the language
>> itself. While Java, in the meantime, hasn't even managed to catch up
>> with them on the closures/lambdas feature.
>> 
>> new await and async keywords
>> 
>> Asynchronous Programming for C# and Visual 
>> Basichttp://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/async.aspx
>> 
>> I still like the Go language approach to async programming better,
>> though, than this.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to