It's biased, of course! Since when was "not lisp" a valid tickable criterion?
They also missed functional composition, homoiconicity, immutabe by default, default/named parameters, by-name params, extensible (either within the syntax or through compiler plugins), implicit conversions, type classes, dependent types, etc, etc... On 10 November 2010 13:41, Steven Siebert <[email protected]> wrote: > http://gosu-lang.org/ > > The side-by-side is interesting: http://gosu-lang.org/comparison.shtml =) > > Apparently they plan to release the language itself (community edition) > soon.... > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- Kevin Wright mail / gtalk / msn : [email protected] pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
