Look at this - maybe it's something: http://community.jboss.org/wiki/Arquillian
<http://community.jboss.org/wiki/Arquillian>There's a hands on lab at Devoxx next Monday. On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 17:19, Alexey Zinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks promising, I'll have to look into this. Thanks, guys. > > Alexey > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Jan Goyvaerts <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Fri, November 12, 2010 6:30:13 AM > *Subject:* Re: [The Java Posse] Hudson and web app continuous integration > > Isn't Jetty often used for this kind of tests ? It starts very quickly and > can be manipulated programmatically. And if I'm not mistaken the last > version of Glassfish allows containers to be created individually for > testing. That's very useful to test EJB. > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:13, Dominic Mitchell <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Alexey Zinger <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> We're looking at Hudson for a continuous integration solution to run a >>> test suite against our Tomcat-hosted web app. As I learn about Hudson, it >>> seems like a nice enough package, but it seems like it lacks any way of >>> either running tests within the app server itself. I'm hearing about people >>> setting up Hudson as a build environment and then make it execute tests that >>> invoke an HTTP client that calls the back-end and then assert on results >>> (this fits nicely into an AJAXy JSON-driven or similar back-end). There are >>> some obvious limitations with this approach, but advantages as well. Are >>> there other (better) ways of going about this? Any firsthand experiences? >>> >> >> How difficult is it to bring up an instance of tomcat specifically to run >> the integration tests? Could you run your app in jetty instead, which might >> be easier to bring up as part of a test? >> >> -Dom >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "The Java Posse" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
