On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So because CPUs are fast enough today we need to invent something to > waste > > cpu cycles again..? Have you got Intel shares ? > > I simply flipped your own argument to show it was pointless, what you > may consider unfeasible today is trivial tomorrow. Mainstream CPU's > with 16-32 cores are right around the corner, yet you insist making > overhead and lack of speed a primary argument. > > > Given significant parts of Dotnet are worthless without COM > > We are talking about the VM's and bytecode here, not specific > libraries or how they are implemented. Part of .NET may delegate to > COM underneath, but that's a completely orthogonal matter. > > > One word "Mono". You seem to think that rewriting massive bits of code is an insignificant effort, as if you do it over a weekend...If its so easy why dont you get it done... > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
