On 26 November 2010 09:47, Miroslav Pokorny <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Fabrizio Giudici < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 11/26/2010 01:09 AM, ags wrote: >> >>> Nothing wrong, just surprising, as the suit over Android did not conclude >>> yet. >>> >> Just to be explicit, in case I've not been understood: this sounds to me >> as the explicit assertion that the Java SE embedded can fit the VM role on >> Android in place of Harmony / Dalvik. I'm neither backing nor negating the >> point (I never ran such a test, and in addition to "pure" performance there >> are things such as startup time, power consumption, etc). I'm saying that >> this could be in preparation of Oracle publicly proposing, in the lawsuit, >> the adoption of Java SE for Android in alternative to the sanctions. >> >> > Well if its faster, doesnt that by definition mean it also uses less power > to do each task that needs to be done. I cant comment because i dont know > but im guessing that the android vm is only started once and is in memory > forever after that, which makes startup time irrelevant given the same > approach could be used by a real java vm. > Not necessarily. That speed could well be achieved at the expense of extra memory usage, which would in turn draw more power. Kevin Wright mail / gtalk / msn : [email protected] pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
